Assessment of the Ecuadorian ECJB 2000 isolate of classical swine fever virus as challenge strain

Main Article Content

Viviana Natalia Santafé-Huera
Maritza Isidra Barrera-Valle
Margoth Yolanda Barrionuevo-Samaniego
William Rodrigo Sotomayor-Ramos
Ana Dolores Garrido-Haro
Alfredo Javier Acosta-Batallas
María I. Baquero-Cárdenas

Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) is an infectious disease responsible for high economic losses in pigs of all ages. Several programs for the control and eradication of this disease have been implemented at a global level, being vaccination the principal mechanism. This research had the purpose of identifying the pathogenicity of an isolated circulating strain in Ecuador, and determining the efficacy of the vaccine applied for prevention. Animals were challenged with decreasing doses of the viral strain ECJB 2000 to obtain 10 median infective doses of this strain in pigs (DI50). Afterward, the efficacy of a vaccine of the lapinized Chinese strain was evaluated against the virus of porcine cholera adapted to a cell culture line derived from a miniature pig kidney (MPK-LC-HCV), averaging a trial potency following the standard protocol of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). The vaccine was applied at different dilutions, and 14 days later, a viral challenge was done with DI50. The unimmunized pigs presented clinical signs from day three post-infection, and the statistical results did not show significant differences in the body temperature registers and leukocyte count. Spearman-Kärber’s trial determined that the vaccine contained 239.88 protective doses (DI50); taking into account that an effective vaccine against classical swine fever virus (CSFV) must have a value of > 100. This study demonstrated that the circulating strain in Ecuador is of elevated pathogenicity and that the vaccine is effective for the control of the disease.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Santafé-Huera VN, Barrera-Valle MI, Barrionuevo-Samaniego MY, Sotomayor-Ramos WR, Garrido-Haro AD, Acosta-Batallas AJ, Baquero-Cárdenas MI. Assessment of the Ecuadorian ECJB 2000 isolate of classical swine fever virus as challenge strain. Rev. Salud Anim. [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];41(2). Available from: https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RSA/article/view/1020
Section
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

References

Blome S, Staubach C, Henke J, Carlson J, Beer M. Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review. Viruses. 2017;9(4):86.

Rojas H, Romero J R. Where to next with animal health in Latin America? The transition from endemic to disease-free status H. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2017;36:331-348.

Postel A, Austermann-Busch S, Petrov A, Moennig V, Becher P. Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of classical swine fever: Recent developments and future challenges. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65:248-261.

Muñoz S, Ruggli N, Rosell R, Pérez L, Frías-Leuporeau M, Fraile L, et al. Postnatal Persistent Infection with Classical Swine Fever Virus and Its Immunological Implications. Plos One. 2015;10:e0125692.

Ferrer E, Fonseca O, Percedo MI, Abeledo MA. Classical swine fever un the Americas and the Caribbean present situation and prospects for control and eradication. Rev Salud Anim. 2010;32:11-21.

Agencia Ecatoriana de Aseguramiento de la Calidad del Agro-Agrocalidad [Internet] 2014; [cited 00/10/2018] . Guia técnica del vacunador de peste porcina clásica.Availible in Availible in http://www.agrocalidad.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SA-PPC-VAC-P2-procedimientos-vacunacion-peste-porcina-clasica.pdf

World Organisation for Animal HealthOIE. 2017; [cited 00/08/2018]. Manual de las pruebas de diagnóstico y de las vacunas para los animales terrestres. http://www.oie.int/es/normas/manual-terrestre/

Hoffmann B, Beer M, Schelp C, Schirrmeier H, Depner K. Validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of classical swine fever. J Virol Methods. 2005;130:36-44.

Garrido A, Barrera M, Acosta A, Flores F. Phylodynamics of classical swine fever virus with emphasis on Ecuadorian strains. Transbound Emerg Dis . 2018;65:782-790.

Mittelholzer C, Moser C, Tratschin J, Hofmann MA. Analysis of classical swine fever virus replication kinetics allows differentiation of highly virulent from avirulent strains. Vet Microbiol. 2000;74:293-308.

Floegel-Niesmann G, Bunzenthal C, Fischer S, Moennig V. Virulence of recent and former classical swine fever virus isolates evaluated by their clinical and pathological signs. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2013;50:214-220.

Lohse L, Nielsen J, Uttenthal Å. Early pathogenesis of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) strains in Danish pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159:327-336.

Summerfield A and Ruggli N Immune responses against classical swine fever virus: between ignorance and lunacy. Front. Vet Sci. 2015;2:1-10.

Campos T, Hernández C, Álvarez J, Rorríguez P, Xiomara C, Renginfo E, et al. Evaluación de una cepa vacunal contra LA PESTE PORCINA CLÁSICA. LABIOFAM. 2010;1:56-61.

Stojanovic D, Ratajac R, Petrovic T, Prodanov-Radulovic J. Prevention of Classical Swine Fever in the border region Croatia-Serbia. In Quality control of two commercial vaccines against classical swine fever. 2012:339-361.

Graham SP, Everett HE, Haines FJ, Johns HL, Sosan OA, Salguero FJ, et al. Challenge of Pigs with Classical Swine Fever Viruses after C-Strain Vaccination Reveals Remarkably Rapid Protection and Insights into Early Immunity. PloS ONE 2012;7(1):1-9.

Kralik P and Ricchi M. A Basic Guide to Real Time PCR in Microbial Diagnostics: Definitions, Parameters, and Everything. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:108.

Lohse L, Nielsen J, Uttenthal Å. Early pathogenesis of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) strains in Danish pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159:327-336.

Merchán M, Torres MI, Díaz A. Molecular Biology Techniques for research development. A literature review. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2017;16(5):796-807.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.