Evaluation of the Mas-D-Tec equipment in the field diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in cattle

Main Article Content

Miguel Pérez-Ruano
Lázaro Tarafa-Zambrana

Abstract

In order to compare the Mas-D-Tec (electrical conductivity) equipment with the California Mastitis Test (CMT) in the field diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis, a controlled study was carried out using these two diagnostic techniques. The study used animals with more than 30 and less than 300 days of lactation belonging to four cattle units located in the municipality of San Jose de las Lajas, Mayabeque province. To perform the study under laboratory conditions, samples between 10 and 20 ml of 420 functional quarters were taken. They were sent to the clinical pathology laboratory UNAH for their immediate processing and they were evaluated in parallel by the California Mastitis Test and the Mas-D-Tec equipment. In order to carry out the study in the field, 172 functional quarters were sampled, being processed in parallel by CMT and MD. In both studies, the concordance index between the two methods (Kappa) was determined. In the laboratory study, 93.7 % of the quarters evaluated as negative by CMT (- and Traces) were also reported negative by the MD equipment (scale from 1 to 4). It is also reported that 78 % of the quarters reported as positive by CMT (+, ++ and +++ scale) were reported as positive by the MD equipment (5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 scale), obtaining a Kappa index of 0.71 and demonstrating a Considerable level of agreement between both methods. In the field study, the results were similar, with a Kappa index of 0.65 and a Considerable level of agreement in both methods.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Pérez-Ruano M, Tarafa-Zambrana L. Evaluation of the Mas-D-Tec equipment in the field diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in cattle. Rev. Salud Anim. [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 7 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];39(3). Available from: https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RSA/article/view/913
Section
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

References

Shahid M, Sabir N, Ahmed I, Wali Khan R, Irshad M, Rizwan M, Ahmed A. Diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in bovine using conventional methods and electronic detector. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci. 2011;6 (11):18-22.

Sahoo NR, Kumar P, Bhusan B, Bhattacharya TK, Dayal S, Sahoo M. Lysozyme in livestock: a guide to selection for disease resistance: a review. J Anim Sci Advan. 2012;2:347-360.

Saltijeral J, Cordova A, Ruiz G, Alonso U. Comparative study of electrical conductivity and CMT of quarter milk samples in dairy farm in Mexico. International Congress of the Society for Animal Hygiène. 2004, Saint-Malo.

Kaşikci G, Cetin O, Bingol BE, Gunduz MC. Relations between electrical conductivity, somatic cell count, California mastitis test and some quality parameters in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Turk. J Vet Anim Sci. 2012;36 (1):49-55.

Deb R, Kumar A, Chakraborty S, Kumar Verma A, Tiwuari R, Dhama K, Singh U, Kumar S. Trends in Diagnosis and Control of Bovine Mastitis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences.2013;16(23):1653-1661.

Badiuzzaman M, Samad MA, Siddiki SHMF, Islam MT, Saha S. Subclinical mastitis in lactating cows: Comparison of four screening tests and effect of animal factors on its occurrence. Bangl J Vet Med. 2015;13:41-50.

Ghasemzadeh-Nava H, Bokaee S, Tajik P, Mohammadsadegh M, Esfandabadi NS, Sensitivity and Specificity of MAS-D-TEC to Detect Subclinical Mastitis in Sheep and Goats. Proceedings, The 15th Congress of FAVA, FAVA - OIE Joint Symposium on Emerging Diseases, 27-30 October 2008, Bangkok, Thailand.

Hovinen M, Aisla AM, Pyorala S. Accuracy and reliability of mastitis detection with electrical conductivity and milk colour measurement in automatic milking. Acta Agricultura Scand Section. 2006; 56:121-127.

Kamphuis C, Mollenhorst H, Heesterbeek JAP, Hogeveen H. Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:3616-3627.

Romero G, Díaz JR, Sabater JM, Pérez C. Evaluation of Commercial Probes for On-Line Electrical Conductivity Measurements during Goat Gland Milking Process. Sensors. 2012;12:4493-4513.

Rutten CJ, Velthuis AGJ, Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H. Invited review: Sensors to support health management on dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:1928-1952.

Petersson-Wolfe CS, Tholen AR, Currin J, Leslie KE. Practical Methods for Mastitis Control. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 2013; 25:341-358.

Suarez VH, Martínez GM, Gianre V, Calvinho L, Rachoski A, Chávez M, Salatin A, Orozco S, Sánchez V, Bertoni E. Relaciones entre el recuento de células somáticas, test de mastitis California, conductividad eléctrica y el diagnóstico de mastitis subclínicas en cabras lecheras. RIA. 2014;40(2):145-153.

Zaninelli M, Rossi L, Tangorra FM, Costa A, Agazzi A, Savoini G. On-line monitoring of milk electrical conductivity by fuzzy logic technology to characterize health status in dairy goats. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2014;13:3170.

Viguier C, Arora S, Gilmartin N, Welbeck K, O’Kennedy R. Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology. 2009;27(8):486-493.

McDaniel BT, Anderson KL, Wilk JC. Evaluation of simple, quit and inexpensive cowside test to indentify subclinical mastitis infections. 1983; ANS. Report No. 246.

NC 78-25. Obtención de muestras. 1987; Comité Estatal de Normalización, La Habana Cuba.

Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.

Lowry, R. VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation. Disponible en http://vassarstats.net. 2017.

Cepero O, Castillo JC, Salado J. Mastitis Subclínica: su detección mediante diferentes técnicas diagnostica en unidades bovinas. REDVET 2005; IV (3) (Consultado 4 de enero de 2014). Disponible en: http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n030305.html.

Kamal RM, Bayoumi MA, Abd El Aal SFA. Correlation between some direct and indirect tests for screen detection of subclinical mastitis. Int Food Res J. 2014;21:1249-1254.

Mohammadsadegh M, Gharagoslu F, Bokaii S. Study the efficacy of an electric conductivity detector (Mas D Tec) in sub clinical mastitis diagnosis. Vet. J. Islam. Azad. Univ., Garmsar Branch.1. 2007;4:15-22.

Petzer IM, Karzis J, Meyer IA, van der Schans TJ. A cost-benefit model comparing the California Milk Cell Test and Milk Electrical Resistance Test. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2013;80(1):1-14.

Norberg E, Ødegard J, Madsen P. Comparison of Variance Components for Test-Day Electrical Conductivity of Milk and Test-Day Somatic Cell Score for First Lactation Cows in an Experimental Herd Acta Agric Scand, Sect. A, Animal Sci. 2004;54:181-186.

Díaz JR, Romero G, Muelas R, Alejandro M, Peris C. Effect of intramammary infection on milk electrical conductivity in murciano-Granadina goats. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:718-726.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.