Strategy against the fly Haematobia irritans and the tick Rhipicephalus microplus with the use of Effipro Bovis in a bovine herd

Main Article Content

Alier Fuentes-Castillo
Yuniel Hernández-Rodríguez
Dalia Quintana-Torrente
Rafmary Rodríguez-Fernández
Luis Méndez-Mellor

Abstract

The control of parasite populations affecting cattle herds is an urgent need in tropical areas, where the presence of ectoparasites is a serious threat to animal health. The tick Rhipicephalus microplus as well as the fly Haematobia irritans cause considerable economic damages, so the control of ectoparasites in animals has been very important, demanding the use of chemical agents for an effective and safe control either for animals or for the environment. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Fipronil (Effipro Bovis) in the control of R. microplus and H. irritans in cattle under field conditions, applying field rotation as a strategy. The study was carried out in a herd of 14 animals: Holstein and mestizo Holstein F1 naturally infested. Animals were divided into the control and treated group; all of them evaluated before and after treatment. Three consecutive trials were conducted, applying the treatment with Effipro Bovis, each time infestation levels were reached above 10 ticks per animal. As a result of the first trial, there was a reduction in infestation intensity to 0.9 ticks per animal (97.6 %) and, for H. irritans, 0.8 flies per animal (99.1 %). A high control percentage was observed in the populations of ticks R. microplus in the first 24 hours, and flies H. irritans in the days following the treatment. The product Effipro Bovis kept controlled R. microplus populations for 35 days and H. irritans for 84 days, with an intermediate treatment of the product 42 days after the application.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Fuentes-Castillo A, Hernández-Rodríguez Y, Quintana-Torrente D, Rodríguez-Fernández R, Méndez-Mellor L. Strategy against the fly Haematobia irritans and the tick Rhipicephalus microplus with the use of Effipro Bovis in a bovine herd. Rev. Salud Anim. [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1 [cited 2025 Apr. 19];40(3). Available from: https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RSA/article/view/995
Section
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

References

Rodríguez-Vivas RI, Rosado-Aguilar JA, Ojeda-Chi MM, Pérez-Cogollo LC, Trinidad-Martínez I, Bolio-González ME. Control integrado de garrapatas en la ganadería bovina. Mérida, Yucatán, México: Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios; junio 2014 [Consulta: diciembre 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/era/v1n3/v1n3a9.pdf.

Adams H, Blagburn B, Lindsay D. Farmacología y terapéutica veterinaria: ectoparasiticidas. 2 ed. Zaragoza: Acribia. 2003. pp. 1091-1115.

Thullner F. Impact of pesticide resistance and network for global pesticide resistance management based on a regional structure. Rev Mundial de Zootecnia (FAO). 1997;89(2):41-47.

FAO. Guidelines for Resistance Management and Integrated Parasite Control in Ruminants. Roma: Animal Production and Health Division, Agriculture Dept., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2004.

Quiroz H. Parasitología y enfermedades parasitarias de animales domésticos. México: LIMUSA; 1999. p. 876.

Bowman D. Parasitología para veterinarios. 9 ed. Barcelona, España: Elsevier; 2011. p. 464.

Cantú A, García Z. Mosca del Cuerno Haematobia irritans un factor negativo en la producción de bovinos de carne: folletos para productores. México, Estado de Tamaulipas: Editorial Local; 2009. 12. ISBN 978-607-425-150-0.

Tingle C, Rother J, Dewhurst C, Lauer S, King W. Health and environmental effects of Fipronil. London: Pesticides Action Network; noviembre 2000 [Consulta: julio 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.pan-uk.org/archive/Publications/Briefing/fipronil.pdf.

Taylor M. Recent developments in ectoparasiticides. The Veterinary Journal. 2002;161(3):253-268.

Gant D, Chalmers A, Wolff M, Hoffman B, Bushey D. Fipronil: action at the GABA receptor. Amsterdam: Pesticides and the future: minimizing chronic exposure of humans and the environment. 1998. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281999605_Fipronil_Action_at_the_GABA_receptor.

Laforé E. Evaluación de la tolerancia y efectos colaterales de una dosis normal de una formulación a base de Fipronil al 0.25 % (Fipronex(r)) en cachorros menores de 2 meses de edad. Agrovet Market: Creativity in Veterinary. 2005. http://www.agrovetmarket.com/pdf/antiparasitario/fipronex/Fipronex%20trabajo%20en%20cachorros%20menos%20de%208%20semana.pdf.

Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos. NORMA Oficial Mexicana. Requisitos de efectividad biológica para los ixodicidas de uso en bovinos y método de prueba. NOM-006-ZOO-1993. México, D.F; abril 1998.

Sievers G, Schwabe A. Comparación del uso tradicional con la aplicación precoz de insecticidas para controlar Haematobiairritans. Rev. Med. Vet. 2003;86(5):58-63.

Campos C, Mariscal P. Frecuencia de infestación por Haematobia irritans (L) en bovinos de predios ganaderos, Casarebe, provincia Cercado, Beni, Bolivia 2014. Beni. Bolivia: Agrociencias Amazonia; 2014;(4):37-43.

Ramos IF. Evaluación de Fipronil "Pouron" para garrapatosis en equinos. (Tesis de Doctorado(. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Guatemala. 2014.

Davey RB, Ahrens EH, George JE, Hunter JS, Jeannin P. Therapeutic and persistent efficacy of fipronil against Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on cattle1. Vet Parasitol. 1998;74(2-4):261-276.

Davey RB, George JE, Hunter JS, Jeannin P. Evaluation of a pour-on formulation of fipronil against Boophilusannulatus (Acari: Ixodidae) under natural South Texas field conditions. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1999;23(4):351-364.