Probiotic effect of efficient microorganisms (ME-AgroAmbiental) on bioproductive indicators in pre-fattening Yorkland pigs

Main Article Content

Mara Dunia Quintana Utra
Alian Hernández González
Abel Saraiba Macias

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the effect of incorporating efficient microorganisms (ME-AgroAmbiental) to the diet of pre-fattening (Yorkshire x Landrace) pigs on bioproductive indicators. Two hundred and seventy animals with an average age of 33 days were used. They were divided into three groups of 45 animals each. Each group had two replicates.Group 1 was used as a negative control, whereas groups 2 and 3 were supplemented with ME-AgroAmbiental six times a day for seven weeks, at concentrations of 5 and 10 %, respectively. Epidemiological indicators such as morbidity, mortality and recovery rate were calculated for gastrointestinal disorders during this stage. Furthermore, weight gain was recorded on a weekly basis and an economic balance was made between the cost of efficient microorganisms and the market price of the pigs. No differences were detected with respect to epidemiological indicators among the groups. By supplementing at 10 %, an average final weight of 27.73±0.945 kg and an average daily gain of 418.83 g/day were recorded, 15 % more than in the other groups (with significant statistical differences). Additionally, a profit of 55424.04 Cuban pesos was obtained. It is concluded that the inclusion of 10 % ME-AgroAmbiental in the diet of pre-fattening Yorkshire pigs does not prevent the occurrence of gastrointestinal disorders, but positively influences weight gaining indicators in a cost-effective manner.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Quintana Utra MD, Hernández González A, Saraiba Macias A. Probiotic effect of efficient microorganisms (ME-AgroAmbiental) on bioproductive indicators in pre-fattening Yorkland pigs. Rev. Salud Anim. [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];43(3). Available from: https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RSA/article/view/1175
Section
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

References

Nguyen TT, Nguyen CH. Effects of inclusion of protein Hydrolysis from Tra catfish by-product wastewater in the diets on apparent ileal digestibility and total tract retention coefficient of local chickens. Livestock Research for rural development. ISSN: 0121-3784. Disponible: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd29/3/nthi29055.html. 2017;29(3):55-60.

Valdés VA, Álvarez VVM, Legrá RA, Bueno F, Narcys Margarita. Efectos de microorganismos eficientes en los indicadores bioproductivos de preceba porcina. Revista de Producción Animal. 2019;31(2).

Sarmiento LAR. Análisis de la microbiota intestinal en un modelo animal. Guía para el estudio de prebióticos y probióticos. Editorial Académica Española. España. ISBN-10 3659053430. 2012;13:20.

Sosa D, García Y, Dustet JC. Development of probiotics for animal production. Experiences in Cuba. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 2018;52(4):1- 17.

Gutiérrez O, Castro MY, Bocourt R. Nuevos enfoques sobre el uso de aditivos en la alimentación animal. Memorias XVIII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias (PANVET). 2002:18-22.

Miranda JE, Marín A. Obtención de Biopreparados, a partir de melaza-vinaza fermentada, con acción probiótica en cerdos. [Tesis en Opción al grado científico de Doctor en Ciencias veterinarias], Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Central ¨Marta Abreu¨. Villa Clara, Santa Clara. 2018.

Morales-Oñate V, Morales-Oñate B. Probióticos como aditivos dietéticos para cerdos. Una revisión. KnE Engineering, Disponible en https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v5i2.6267. 2020;5(2):477-499.

Swientek B. Beneficial Bacteria. Prebiotics and Probiotics work in tandem to stimulate a healthy microflora in the gastrointestinal tract. Food product development. 2003:68-96.

Ojeda GF, Blanco BD, Cepero CL, Izquierdo M. Efecto de la inclusión de un biopreparado de microorganismos eficientes (IHplus®) en dieta de cerdo en ceba. Pastos y Forrajes. 2019;39(2):119-124.

Rostagno HS, Teixeira LF, Hannas MI, López J, Kazue N, Guilherme F, et al. Tablas brasileñas para aves y cerdo, composición de alimentos y requerimientos nutricionales. Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brasil. 2017:403- 404.

Manual de Procedimientos Técnicos para la Crianza Porcina, MPTCP. Instituto de Investigaciones Porcinas. EDIPORC. La Habana, Cuba. 2015:6:pp.60.

Casco V, Xochil E, González U, Kerstin M. Impacto sanitario y productivo en cerdos topig categoría de crecimiento en la granja Alba Porcina, Cofradía, con la administración de microorganismos de montaña como probióticos. [Tesis de licenciatura]. Universidad Nacional Agraria. Nicaragua. 2018:pp.46.

Kanengoni AT, Thomas R, Gelaw AK, Madoroba E. Epidemiology and characterization of Escherichia coli outbreak on a pig farm in South Africa. FEMS. Microbiology Letters. 2017;(3).364.

Pérez RM, Almenteros M, Vega E. Evaluación de la colonización del tracto digestivo de cerdos por cepas de Lactobacillus acidophilus y Streptoccoccus termophilus, componentes de un producto probiótico. Revista de Salud Animal. 2014;36(3):141-146.

Erickson KL, Hubbard NE. Probióticos en inmunomodulación salud y enfermedad. Revista de Nutrición. 2000;130:403S-409S.

Valdés A, García Y, Alvares VM, Samón A, Pérez E, Serrano JO, et al. Efecto de microorganismos eficientes, autóctonos de Guantánamo, Cuba, en indicadores bioproductivos y hematológicos de preceba porcina. Cuban Journal Agricultural Science. 2020;54(3).

Lee SJ, Cho SJ, Park EA. Effects of probiotics on enteric flora and feeding tolerance in preterm infants. Neonatology. 2007;91(3):174-179.

Craig L, Maynard CL, Elson CO, Hatton RD, Weaver CT. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature, 2012;489:231-224.

Suo C, Yin Y, Wang X, Lou X, Song D, Wang X. Effects of lactobacillus plantarum zj316 on pig growth and pork quality. BMC Veterinary Research. 2012;(25):8-89.

Freitas M, Tavan E, Cayuela C. Host-pathogens crosstalk. Indigenous bacteria and probiotics also play the game. Biol Cell. 2013;125:503-506.

Vera RR, Vega CE, Sánchez ML. Efecto de Lactobacillus plantarum como probiótico en cerdos al destete. Rev Salud Anim. 2018;(40):3.

Fooks L, Fuller RY, Gibson G. Probiotics, prebiotics and human gut microbiology. Int Dairy J. 1999;9(1):53-61.

Álvarez NS, Bague AJ. Los alimentos funcionales. Madrid: A. Madrid Vicente, Ediciones. 2011:23.

Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Verheijen R, Jørgensen L, Raff L. Effects of a mixture of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on the performance of growing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020;261(114409). Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114409.

Mazamba S, Cedeño ML, Coello R. Evaluación de dietas conteniendo probiótico y antibiótico como aditivos en cerdos en fase de desarrollo. Centrosur. 2021;1(9):1-14. Disponible en https://centrosuragraria. com/index.php/revista/article/view/57.

Flores L, Usca J, Peñafiel S, Tello L. Probióticos como aditivos dietéticos para cerdos. Revisión. Congreso internacional de la ciencia, tecnología, emprendimiento e innovación. 2020:447-499.

Most read articles by the same author(s)