Optimization of the culture conditions for the development of a bacterial biofilm and its application as a biofertilizer in Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Río grande

Article Sidebar

HTML (Español (España)) PDF (Español (España)) XML-JATS (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))
Published: Aug 1, 2019
Keywords:
Bacillus subtilis, biofertilizers, biofilm, Solanum lycopersicum L, tomato

Main Article Content

Gabriela C. Sarti
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Ana E.J. Cristóbal Miguez
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Alfredo J. Curá
Universidad de Buenos Aires

Abstract

The aim of this work was to optimize the growth conditions of Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii for the development of a biofilm and its use as a biofertilizer in tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum L.var. Río Grande). Different culture media were tested for the development of biofilms, which were dried and weighed to determine their mass. The time for biofilm disintegration was also determined. The bacteria were introduced under two treatments: fertile or tindalized soil. The aerial and root dry mass was weighed. The differences in the biomass of the aerial part and root of the tomato plants were analyzed by a simple ANOVA. The means were compared by the Tukey test at a significance level of 0.05. The statistical analysis was carried out with the software Infostat 2016. The biofilms obtained were evaluated in terms of arithmetic percentages and standard deviations of three repetitions. The greatest amount of biofilm was obtained in the glucose potato medium, and it was the most resistant to disintegration. No higher seedling growth was shown by the treatment with inoculated seeds in fertile soil compared with the uninoculated controls. However, when the tindalized soil was used, the aerial and root biomass of the inoculated seedlings was significantly higher than in the uninoculated controls. The biofilm developed by Bacillus in the potato glucose medium could be used as a biofertilizer in tomato.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sarti, G. C., Cristóbal Miguez, A. E., & Curá, A. J. (2019). Optimization of the culture conditions for the development of a bacterial biofilm and its application as a biofertilizer in Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Río grande. Revista De Protección Vegetal, 34(2). Retrieved from https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RPV/article/view/1037
Issue
Vol. 34 No. 2 (2019): mayo-agosto
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:

  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra, siempre que se indique su autor y la primera publicación en esta revista. Bajo esta licencia el autor será libre de:
  • Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
  • Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material
  • El licenciador no puede revocar estas libertades mientras cumpla con los términos de la licencia

Bajo las siguientes condiciones:

  • Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
  • NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
  • No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
  1. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  2. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

References

Murillo RAL, Reyes Pérez JJ, López Bustamante RJ, Reyes Bermeo M, Murillo Campuzano G, Sarmaniego Armijos C. Abonos orgánicos y su efecto en el crecimiento y desarrollo del cultivo de tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Centro Agrícola. 2015; 42(4):67-74.

Wakil W, Brustand G, Pening T. Sustainable management of arthropod pest of tomato. 2017. 1er Edition. 372 p.ebook ISBN 9780128135082

Cruz Koizumi YP, Alayón Gamboa JA, Morón Ríos A. Efecto de la fertilización orgánica y de la síntesis química en tomate verde Physalis ixocarpa Brot. (Ex Horn) en Calakmul, Campeche (México). Avances en investigación agropecuaria. 2017; 21(2): 41-53.

Kloepper J, Rodriguez-Ubana R, Zehnder G, Murphy J, Sikora E, Fernandez C. Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potencial extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology. 1999; (28):21-26.

Espinosa Palomeque B, Moreno Reséndez A, Cano Ríos P, De Paul Álvarez Reyna V, Sáenz Mata J Sánchez Galván H et al. Inoculación de rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal en tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. Afrodita en invernadero. Terra Latinoamérica. 2017, 35:169-178.

Hernández Montiel LG, Chiquito Contreras RG, Castillo Rocha DG, Contreras CJ, Vidal Hernández L, Beltrán Morales FA. Efecto de microcápsulas de Pseudomonas putida sobre crecimiento y rendimiento de pimiento marrón. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2018; 20:325-334.

Prashar P, Kapoor N, Sachdeva S. Rhizosphere: its structure, bacterial diversity and significance. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2014; 22:1-15.

Borriss R. Bacillus, a plant beneficial bacterium" in Principles of Plant Microbe Interactions. Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture, ed. B. Lugtenberg (Berlin: Springer). 2015; 379- 391.

Stein T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Molecular Microbiology. 2005; 56 (4):845-857.

Zhiqiong T, Baoying L, Rongyi Z. A novel antifungal protein of Bacillus subtilis B25. SpringerPlus. 2013; 2 (543):2-6.

Baindara P, Mandal SM, Chawla N, Kumar Singh P, Kumar Pinnaka A, Korpole S. Characterization of two antimicrobial peptides produced by a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis strain SK.DU.4 isolated from a rhizosphere soil simple. AMB Express. 2013; 30 (2):465-478.

Trejo M, Douarchea C, Bailleuxa V, Poularda C, Mariota S, Regeardb C, Raspauda E. Elasticity and wrinkled morphology of Bacillus subtilis pellicles. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America). 2013; 110 (6):2011-2016.

Stanley N, Lazazzera B. Defining the genetic differences between wild and domestic strains of Bacillus subtilius that affect poly DL glutamic acid production and biofilm formation. Molecular Microbiology. 2005; 57(4):1143-1158.

Billings N, Ramirez Millan M, Caldara M, Rusconi R, Tarasova1 Y, Stocker R, Ribbeck K. The Extracellular Matrix Component Psl Provides FastActing Antibiotic Defense in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. PLOS Pathogens. 2013; 9(8). http://www.plospathogens.org

Branda SS, Friedman V, Kolter K. Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends in Microbiology. 2005; (13):20-26.

Sinha SD, Chatterjee S, Maiti PK, Tarafdar S, Moulik SP. Evaluation of the role of substrate and albumin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm morphology through FESEM and FTIR studies on polymeric biomaterials. Programation Biomaterials. 2017; 6:27-38.

Berhe N, Tefera Y, Tintagu T. Review on biofilm formation and its control options. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences. 2017; 8 (4):122-133.

Tomlinson AD, Fuqua C. Mechanisms and regulation of polar surface attachment in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Current opinion in microbiology. 2009; (12):708-714.

Strauss SL, Stover JK, Kluepfel DA. Impact of biological amendments on Agrobacterium tumefaciens survival in soil. Applied Soil Ecology. 2015; (87):39-48.

Walker TS, Bais HP, Deziel E, Schweizer HP, Rahme LG, Fall R, Vivanco JM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-plant root interactions. Pathogenicity, biofilm formation, and root exudation. Plant Physiology. 2004; (134):320-331.

Ansari FA, Ahmad I. Flourescent Pseudomonas FAP2 and Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and fhotosynthetic attributes. Scientific reports. 2019; 9:45-47.

Godino A, Príncipe A, Fischer S. A pts P deficiency in PGPR Pseudomonas fluorescens SF39a affects bacteriocin production and bacterial fitness in the wheat rhizosphere. Research in Microbiology. 2016; (167) I:3 p178-189.

Ghosh R, Barman S, Mandal NCh. Phosphate defciency induced bioflm formation of Burkholderia on insoluble phosphate granules plays a pivotal role for maximum release of soluble phosphate. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9:5477.

Hölscher T, Bartels B, Cheng Lin Y, Monterrosa R, Whelan A, Kolter R, et al. Motility, chemotaxis and aerotaxis contribute to competitiveness during bacterial pellicle biofilm development. Journal Molecular Biology. 2015; (427):3695-3708.

Kobayashi K. Bacillus subtilis pellicle formation proceeds through genetically defined morphological changes. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007; (56):4920-4931.

Lim Y, Jana M, Luong TT, Lee CY. Control of glucose -and NaCl- induced bio?lm formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004; (186):722-729.

Morikawa M. Benedficial biofilm formation by industrial bacteria Bacillus subtilis and related species. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2006;1 (101):1-8.

Banin E, Vasil M, Greenberg E. Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bio?lm formation. Procceeding. Academic Science. USA. 2005; (102):11076-11081.

Kovács A, Dragoš A. Evolved biofilm: Review on the experimental evolution Studies of Bacillus subtilis Pellicles. Journal of Molecular Biology Article in press. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.02.005.

Kankeu E, Max S, Brink A. Adaptation behaviour of bacterial species and impact on the biodegradation of biodiesel. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Enginering. 2017; (34):469-480.

Vazquez Vazquez JL. Producción, caracterización parcial y evaluación de la capacidad emulsificante de hidrocarburos del bioemulsificante de Actinobacter bouvetii UAM25. (Tesis de posgrado: aspirante a doctorado en biotecnología(. 105 p. Universidad autónoma Metropolitana, México. 2018. http://148.206.53.84/tesiuami/UAMI22467.pdf

Vozza N. Factores de adhesión de Rhizobium leguminosarum y su rol en la formación de biofilms. (Tesis doctoral(. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires 2012. https://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/collection/tesis/document/tesis_n5057_Vozza

Yang L, Hiu Y, Liu Y, Molin S. Distinct roles of extracellular polymeric substances in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Environmental Microbiology. 2012; (13):1705-1711.

Reisner A, Krogfelt K, Klein B, Zechner E, Molin S. In vivo biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains: Impact of environmental and genetic factors. Journal Bacteriology. 2006; (188):3572-3581.

Allan V, Callow M, Macaskie L, Paterson-Beedle M. Effect of nutrient limitation on biofilm formation and phosphatase activity of a Citrobacter sp. Microbiology. 2002; 148:277-288.

Huang Y, Dobretsov S, Xiong H, Pei-Yuan Q. Effect of Biofilm Formation by Pseudoalteromonas spongiae on Induction of Larval Settlement of the Polychaete Hydroides elegans. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2007; 73 (19):228-236.

Branda SS, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Ben-Yehuda S, Losick R, Kolter R. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001; 98:11621-11626.

Branda SS, Vik S, Friedman L, Kolter R. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends Microbiology. 2005; 13:20-26.

Branda SS, Chu F, Kearns DB, Losick R, Kolter R. A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Molecular Microbiology. 2006; 59:1229-1238.

Reisner A, Krogfelt K, Klein B, Zechner E, Molin S. In vivo biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains: Impact of environmental and genetic factors. Journal Bacteriology. 2006; (188):3572-3581.

Buddrus-Schiemann K, Schmid M, Schreiner K, Welzl G, Hartmann A. Root Colonization by Pseudomonas sp DSMZ 13134 and Impact on the Indigenous Rhizosphere Bacterial Community of Barley. Microbial Ecology. 2010; 60(2):381-393.

Posadas Uribe LF. Promoción del crecimiento vegetal de Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575, colonización rizosférica y potencial genómico y bioquímico. (Tesis de doctorado en bioquímica). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias, Medellín, Colombia. 2017. http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/57419/1/43979285.2017.pdf

Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC. Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (RPCV): A review. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2016; 2:1127500.

Sanchez López DB. Efecto de rizobacterias promotoras de crecimiento vegetal solubilizadoras de fósforo en Lactuca sativa cultivar White Boston. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología. 2014; (16):122-128.

Niñirola D, Pignata SN, Egea-Gilabert C, Fernández JA. Efecto de las RPCV en la producción y vida útil del berro (Nasturtium officinale) cultivado en bandejas flotantes. III Workshop en Investigación Agroalimentaria, Cartagena, Colombia. 2014. https://iris.unito.it/handle/2318/1520962#.XQuyfBZKjIU