In vitro antagonism of endophytic endospore-forming bacteria against Moniliophthora roreri H.C Evans et al.

Main Article Content

María Aracely Vera Loor
Alexander Bernal Cabrera
Danilo Vera Coello
Michel Leiva Mora
Alan Rivero Aragón
Amstrong Edison Agustín Vera Loor

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the antagonistic effect of the endophytic endospore-forming bacteria against M. roreri, as well as its identification. The trial was carried out by dual culture method on Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar culture medium (PDA). The bacterial inoculum was placed in the center of the plate, and discs of the pathogenic fungus were placed on both sides of the plate. M. roreri colony growth was measured and the radial growth inhibition percentage (RGIP) was calculated at 15 days. A completely randomized design was used with five replicates per treatment (isolate from endophytic bacteria) and control (M. roreri). Besides, bacteria were characterized from the cultural, morphological and physiological point of view according to methodologies collected in the scientific literature. In the antagonism test, 23 isolates of the bacteria (51.1 %) showed a RGIP in the pathogen ranging from 53.8 to 73.8 %; while 22 isolates (48.9 %) registered a RGIP between 2.8 and 47.2 %, at 15 days of incubation in the interaction. The description of the bacterial isolates based on their cultural and morpho-physiological characteristics confirmed their taxonomic location in the group of the aerobic endospore-forming bacteria, class Bacilli. It is demonstrated the high potential of new strains of Bacillus spp. as promising candidates for the biological control of M. roreri, which is the causal agent of frosty pod rot.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vera Loor, M. A., Bernal Cabrera, A., Vera Coello, D., Leiva Mora, M., Rivero Aragón, A., & Vera Loor, A. E. A. (2020). In vitro antagonism of endophytic endospore-forming bacteria against Moniliophthora roreri H.C Evans et al. Revista De Protección Vegetal, 35(2). Retrieved from https://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RPV/article/view/1098
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

References

Marelli JP, Guest DI, Bailey BA, Evans HC, Brown JK, Junaid M, et al. Chocolate under threat from old and new cacao diseases. Phytopathology. 2019; 109 (8):1331-1343.

Zion Market Research. Chocolate market by type of chocolate (dark, milk and white) and by sales category (everyday chocolate, premium chocolate and seasonal chocolate): Global industry perspective, comprehensive analysis and forecast 2017-2024. 2018; http://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/chocolate-market.

Ploetz RC. The Impact of diseases on cacao production: A global overview. Part I, Chapter 2, In: B. A. Bailey.; L.W. Meinhardt (eds.). Cacao Diseases: A History of Old Enemies and New Encounters. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2016; 33-59.

Bailey BA, Meinhardt LW. Cacao Diseases: A History of Old Enemies and New Encounters. Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. 2016; 630 pp.

Evans HC. Frosty pod rot (Moniliophthora roreri) Part II, Chapter 3, In: B. A. Bailey .; L.W. Meinhardt (eds.). Cacao Diseases: A History of Old Enemies and New Encounters. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2016; 63-96.

Qiao J, Wu H, Huo R, Gao X, Borriss R. Stimulation and biocontrol by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 engineered for improved action. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014;1(12): 2-14.

Prameela Jha, Panwar J, Nath Jha P. Mechanistic insights on plant root colonization by bacterial endophytes: a symbiotic relationship for sustainable agriculture. Environmental Sustainability. 2018; 1:25-38.

Olanrewaju OS, Glic BR, Babalola OO. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017; 33(11):197.

Singh M, Singh D, Gupta A, Pandey KD, Singh PK, Kumar A. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Application in Biofertilizers and Biocontrol of Phytopathogens. Chapterthree. In: PGPR Amelioration in Sustainable Agriculture. 2019; 41-66.

Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile Weapons for Plant Disease Biocontrol. Trends in Microbiology. 2008; 16: 115-125.

Thakur P, Singh I. Biocontrol of soilborne root pathogens: An Overview. In: B. Giri, et al. (eds.), Root Biology, Soil Biology 52, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature. 2018;184-185.

Melnick RL, Suarez C, Bailey BA, Backman PA. Isolation of endophytic endospore-forming bacteria from Theobroma cacao as potential biological control agents of cacao diseases. Biological Control. 2011; 57: 236-245.

Reyes O, Ortiz CF, Torres M, Lagunes L, Valdovinos G. Especies de Trichoderma del agroecosistema cacao con potencial de biocontrol sobre Moniliophthora roreri. Rev. Chapingo. Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 2016; 22(2):149-163.

StatSoft, Inc. (2014). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. http://www.statsoft.com.

Cruz M. Potencial de cepas de Bacillus spp. aisladas de la filosfera de Musa spp. como agentes de biocontrol de Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet. [Tesis presentada en opción al grado científico de Doctor en Ciencias Agrícolas]. Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas. 2015; 100 pp.

Reiner K. Catalase test protocol. American Society for Microbiology, ASM Microbe Library. 2010.

Orberá TM, Serrat MJ, González Z. Potencialidades de bacterias aerobias formadoras de endosporas para el biocontrol en plantas ornamentales. Fitosanidad. 2009; 13(2): 95-100.

Sosa A, Pazos V, Torres D, Casadesús L. Identificación y caracterización de seis aislados pertenecientes al género Bacillus promisorios para el control de Rhizoctonia solani Künh y Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Fitosanidad . 2011;15(1): 39-43.

Falardeau J, Wise C, Novitsky L, Avis TJ. Ecological and mechanistic insights into the direct and indirect antimicrobial properties of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptides on plant pathogens. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2013; 39:869-878.

Gao P, Qin J, Li D, Zhou S. Inhibitory effect and possible mechanism of a Pseudomonas strain QBA5 against gray mold on tomato leaves and fruits caused by Botrytis cinerea. PLoS One. 2018; 13.

Meena KR, Kanwar SS. Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: Applications in Foof safety and therapeutics. BioMed Research International. 2015:19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/473050.

Harwood CR, Mouillon JM, Pohl S, Arnau J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2018; 42(6): 721-738.

Rojas MM, Sánchez D, Rosales K, Lugo D. Antagonismo de Bacillus frente a hongos fitopatógenos de cultivos hortícolas. Rev. Protección Vegetal. 2017; 32(2):1-9.

de Almeida KB, Carpentieri V, Fira D, Balatti PA, Yanil SM, Oro TH, et al. Screening of bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents against soybean diseases. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2018; doi: 10.1111/jam.14041.

Pila FES. Importancia de los lipopéptidos de Bacillus subtilis en el control biológico de enfermedades en cultivos de gran valor económico. Bionatura. 2016; 1(3): 135-138.

Muthukumar A, Udhayakumar R, Naveenkumar R. Role of bacterial endophytes in plant disease control. Chapter 7, p. 138-140. In: D.K. Maheshwari y K. Annapurna (eds.), Endophytes: Crop productivity and protection, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. 2017; 16, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66544-3-7.

Villarreal-Delgado MF, Villa-Rodríguez ED, Cira-Chávez LA, Estrada-Alvarado MI, Parra-Cota FI, De los Santos-Villalobos S. The genus Bacillus as a biological control agent and its implications in the agricultural biosecurity. Rev. Mexicana de Fitopatología. 2017; 36(1): 95-130.

Most read articles by the same author(s)